EVM Systems, LLC v. Rex Medical, L.P. et al. (Eastern District of Texas)

Represented accused infringers in patent litigation matter involving vena cava filter medical devices, obtaining a successful jury verdict.

Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd, v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (District of New Jersey)

Represented accused infringer in patent litigation matter involving DRAM and other semi-conductor devices and methods of manufacture, obtaining a successful jury verdict.

RLIS, Inc. v. Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc. (Southern District of Texas)

Represented accused infringer in patent litigation matter involving electronic medical records system.

The Boler Company v. Arvinmeritor Inc. (Northern District of Illinois)

Represented accused infringer in patent litigation matter involving trailer axle suspension systems.

Solocron Education, LLC v. LearnSomething, Inc. et al. (Eastern District of Texas)

Represented accused infringers LearnSomething and Xerox in patent infringement matter involving remote education processes and authentication.

Sockeye Licensing TX, LLC v. Xerox Corporation (Eastern District of Texas) & Xerox Corporation v. Wildcat Licensing LLC (Northern District of Illinois)

Represented accused infringer Xerox in patent infringement matter involving mobile wireless devices that establish a network to communicate with printers.

Better Bags, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc., et al. (Southern District of Texas)

Represented accused infringer Illinois Tool Works in patent litigation matter involving resealable plastic bag technology.

Gen. Tech. Ltd., v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC (District of Colorado) (Middle District of North Carolina) and (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation)

Represented accused infringer GlaxoSmithKline in patent litigation matter involving methods for analyzing genetic variations in a non-coding region of DNA sequences to detect linked coding region alleles.

Aspex Eyewear Inc. v. Zenni Optical (Southern District of Florida)

Represented patent owner in litigation involving eyewear with magnetic shades.

Honeywell International Inc. v. Furuno Electric Co. (District of Minnesota)

Represented accused infringer in patent litigation matter involving marine electronic devices, radar systems, and sonar devices.

ArvinMeritor Technology, L.L.C. v. Inalfa Roof Systems, Inc. (Eastern District of Michigan)

Represented patent owner in litigation involving retractable roof systems for vehicles.

ST Sales Tech Holdings LLC v. Daimler Chrysler (Eastern District of Texas)

Represented accused infringer Daimler Chrysler in patent litigation matter involving sale lead generation and management systems and processes.

VitalStim, LLC et al v. eSwallow USA, LLC (Northern District of Georgia)

Represented accused infringer in patent litigation matter involving electrical pharyngeal neuromuscular stimulators.

Arrivalstar SA et al v. Canadian National Railway Company et al. (Northern District of Illinois)

Represented accused infringer in patent litigation matter involving arrival and status messaging systems.

International Trade Commission (ITC), 337-TA-900: Certain Navigation Products, Including GPS Devices, Navigation and Display Systems, Radar Systems, Navigational Aids, Mapping Systems and Related Software – Furuno Electric Co. v. Navico, et al.

Represented accused infringer in patent litigation matter involving marine electronic devices, radar systems, and sonar devices.

International Trade Commission (ITC), 337-TA-726: Certain Electronic Imaging Devices – Flashpoint Technology, Inc. v. LG Electronics, et al.

Represented accused infringer in patent litigation matter involving imaging display and rotation on wireless mobile devices.

International Trade Commission (ITC), 337-TA-531: Certain Network Controllers – Marvell International Ltd. v. Realtek Semiconductor Inc. et al.

Represented accused infringer in patent litigation matter involving network controllers.